
Texas Southern (HBCU) FCS : SWAC
|
Location Houston TX Spirit Name Tigers Mascot Kid Tiger |
Stadium: Delmar: FCS Rank 67 Capacity: 12,000 Surface: Grass Offense Data | Defense Data |
University Snapshot
| Year | Annual Record |
Coach | Head Coach Record | Overall Record | Total Win Rank / Winning % | Returning Letterman | Returning Starters |
Attendance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 0-0 (9-3 Vacated) | Johnnie Cole | @ TSU 0-0 Winning Percentage 00.00 | 286-355-27 Winning Percentage 44.84 | Total Win Rank 96 Winning Percentage Rank 107 | Total 52 Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense 7* Defense 7 | 8,684 Increase FCS Rank 46 |
| 2010 | 0-0 (6-5 Vacated) | Johnnie Cole | @ TSU 0-0 Winning Percentage 00.00 | 286-352-27 Winning Percentage 45.04 | Total Win Rank 98 Winning Percentage Rank 108 | Total NA Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense 6 Defense 6 | 6,411 FCS Rank 71 |
| 2011 | 4-7 | Kevin Ramsey | @ TSU 4-7 Winning Percentage 36.36 | 290-362-27 Winning Percentage 44.70 | Total Win Rank 97 Winning Percentage Rank 107 | Total 36 Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense 4 Defense 5 | 6,678 Decrease FCS Rank 71 |
| 2012 | 2-9 | Darrell Ashberry | @ TSU 2-9 Winning Percentage 18.18 | 292- 371-27 Winning Percentage 44.28 | Total Win Rank 94 Winning Percentage Rank 1044 | Total 53 Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense 6* Defense 7 | 5,073 Decrease FCS Rank 87 |
| 2013 | 2-9 | Darrell Ashberry | @ TSU 4-18 Winning Percentage 18.18 | 294-380-27 Winning Percentage 43.87 | Total Win Rank 95 Winning Percentage Rank 105 | Total NA Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 6,619 Increase FCS Rank 69 |
| 2014 | 5-6 | Darrell Ashberry | @ TSU 9-24 Winning Percentage 27.28 | 299-386-27 Winning Percentage 43.89 | Total Win Rank 93 Winning Percentage Rank 103 | Total NA Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 4,318 Decrease FCS Rank 96 |
| 2015 | 3-7 | Darrell Ashberry | @ TSU 12-31 Winning Percentage 27.91 | 302-393-27 Winning Percentage 43.70 | Total Win Rank 94 Winning Percentage Rank 105 | Total NA Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 7,075 Increase FCS Rank 56 |
| 2016 | 4-7 | Michael Haywood | @ TSU 4-7 Winning Percentage 36.36 | 306-400-27 Winning Percentage 43.59 | Total Win Rank 94 Winning Percentage Rank 105 | Total NA Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 5,371 Decrease FCS Rank 85 |
| 2017 | 2-9 | Michael Haywood | @ TSU 6-16 Winning Percentage 27.37 | 308-409-27 Winning Percentage 43.21 | Total Win Rank 95 Winning Percentage Rank 105 | Total NA Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 6,605 Increase FCS Rank 66 |
| 2018 | 2-9 | Michael Haywood | @ TSU 8-25 Winning Percentage 24.24 | 310-418-27 Winning Percentage 42.85 | Total Win Rank 97 Winning Percentage Rank 105 | Total NA Offense NA Defense NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 4,355 Decrease FCS Rank 90 |
| 2019 | 0-11 | Clarence McKinney | @ TSU 0-11 Winning Percentage 00.00 | 310-429-27 Winning Percentage 42.23 | Total Win Rank 99 Winning Percentage Rank 105 | Total NA Offense NA Defense NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 9,204 Increase FCS Rank 29 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | Clarence McKinney | @ TSU 1-13 Winning Percentage 07.14 | 311-431-27 Winning Percentage 42.20 | Total Win Rank 100 Winning Percentage Rank 105 | Total NA Offense NA Defense NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | Covid 19 |
| 2021 | 3-8 | Clarence McKinney | @ TSU 4-21 Winning Percentage 16.00 | 314-439-27 Winning Percentage 41.99 | Total Win Rank 101 Winning Percentage Rank 105 | Total NA Offense NA Defense NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 6,710 Decrease FCS Rank 54 |
| 2022 | 5-6 | Clarence McKinney | @ TSU 9-27 Winning Percentage 25.00 | 319-445-27 Winning Percentage 42.04 | Total Win Rank 101 Winning Percentage Rank 115 | Total NA Offense NA Defense NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 10,667 Increase FCS Rank 19 |
| 2023 | 3-8 | Clarence McKinney | @ TSU 12-35 Winning Percentage 25.53 | 322-453-27 Winning Percentage 41.83 | Total Win Rank 99 Winning Percentage Rank 113 | Total NA Offense NA Defense NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 7,422 Decrease FCS Rank 48 |
| 2024 | 5-6 | Cheis Diahman | @ TSU 5-6 Winning Percentage 45.45 | 327-459-27 Winning Percentage 41.88 | Total Win Rank 98 Winning Percentage Rank 112 | Total NA Offense NA Defense NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 10,225 INcrease FCS Rank 23 |
| 2025 | 0-0 | Cheis Diahman | @ TSU 5-6 Winning Percentage 45.45 | 327-459-27 Winning Percentage 41.88 | Total Win Rank 98 Winning Percentage Rank 113 | Total NA Offense NA Defense NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | TBD |
| * = Returning Quarterback | ||||||||
Schedule (2025)
Record 2025
Overall: W:2 L:3 T:0
Conf: W:2 L:3 T:0
Division: W:2 L:3 T:0
| Game Date | Home VS Away | Score | Game Stats | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Aug-30 2025 |
Texas Southern (HBCU)
-VS- PV A&M, TX (HBCU) |
LOSS 21 - 22 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sep-06 2025 |
California
-VS- Texas Southern (HBCU) |
LOSS 35 - 3 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sep-13 2025 |
Texas Southern (HBCU)
-VS- Lamar University (TX) |
LOSS 7 - 31 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BYE WEEK! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sep-27 2025 |
MS Valley (HBCU)
-VS- Texas Southern (HBCU) |
N/A |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Oct-04 2025 |
Texas Southern
-VS- Arkansas-Pine Bluff |
WIN 51 - 7 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Oct-11 2025 |
Grambling
-VS- Texas Southern |
WIN 20 - 21 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Oct-18 2025 |
Texas Southern (HBCU)
-VS- VA Lynchburg, (HBCU) |
N/A |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BYE WEEK! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nov-01 2025 |
Texas Southern (HBCU)
-VS- Alcorn St, MS (HBCU) |
N/A |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nov-08 2025 |
Alabama State (HBCU)
-VS- Texas Southern (HBCU) |
N/A |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nov-15 2025 |
Southern, LA (HBCU)
-VS- Texas Southern (HBCU) |
N/A |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nov-22 2025 |
Texas Southern (HBCU)
-VS- Alabama A&M (HBCU) |
N/A |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Record 2025Overall: W:2 L:3 T:0 |
Totals
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Offense Data Back To Top
Offense Total Yards
| Games | Yards | Avg. Yards Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1520 | 304 |
Offense Passing
| Games | Yards | Avg. Passing Yards Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 621 | 124 |
Offense Rushing
| Games | Yards | Avg. Rushing Yards Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 899 | 180 |
Offense Scoring
| Games | Total Points | Avg. Points Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 103 | 21 |
Offense Turnovers
| Games | Turnovers | Avg. Turnovers Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 5 | 1 |
Offense Third Down Conversion
| Third Down Attempts | Third Down Coversions | Third Down Conversion Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| 62 | 26 | 41.9% |
Offense Red Zone
| Games | RZ Drives | RZ Scores | RZ Points | RZ Rushing TD | RZ Passing TD | RZ TD Total | RZ Field Goals | RZ Scoring Percentage | RZ TD Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 6 | 5 | 27 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 83% | 67% |
Defense Data Back To Top
Defense Total Yards
| Games | Opponent Total Yards | Opponent Avg. Yards Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1852 | 370 |
Defense Passing
| Games | Opponent Total Passing Yards | Opponent Avg. Passing Yards Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 921 | 184 |
Defense Rushing
| Games | Opponent Total Rushing Yards | Opponent Avg. Passing Yards Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 931 | 186 |
Defense Scoring
| Games | Opponent Total Points | Opponent Avg. Points Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 115 | 23 |
Defense Turnovers
| Games | Opponent Turnovers | Opponent Avg. Turnovers Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 11 | 2.2 |
Defense Third Down Stops
| Opponent Third Down Attempts | Opponent Third Down Coversions | Opponent Third Down Conversion Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| 61 | 25 | 41% |
Defense Red Zone
| Games | Opponent RZ Drives | Opponent RZ Scores | Opponent RZ Points | Opponent RZ Rushing_TD | Opponent RZ Passing_TD | Opponent RZ Zone TD | Opponent RZ Field Goals | Opponent RZ Scoring Percentage | Opponent RZ TD Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 10 | 8 | 45 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 80% | 70% |















































