SE Missouri State FCS : Big South-OVC
|
Location Cape Girardeau MO Spirit Name Redhawks Mascot Rowdy |
Stadium: Houck: FCS Rank 72 Capacity: 11,015 Surface: FieldTuirf Offense Data | Defense Data |
University Snapshot
| Year | Annual Record |
Coach | Head Coach Record | Overall Record | Total Win Rank / Winning % | Returning Letterman | Returning Starters |
Attendance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 9-3 | Tony Samual | @ SEMO 22-35 Winning Percentage 38.60 | 429-473-37 Winning Percentage 47.66 | Total Win Rank 66 Winning Percentage Rank 95 | Total 47 Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense 7* Defense 6 | 8,342 Increase FCS Rank 52 |
| 2010 | 4-7 | Tony Samual | @ SEMO 13-32 Winning Percentage 28.89 | 420-470-37 Winning Percentage 47.30 | Total Win Rank 69 Winning Percentage Rank 97 | Total NA Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense 7 Defense 7 | 5,835 Increase FCS Rank 65 |
| 2011 | 3-8 | Tony Samual | @ SEMO 25-43 Winning Percentage 36.76 | 432-481-37 Winning Percentage 47.42 | Total Win Rank 67 Winning Percentage Rank 96 | Total 42 Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense 3* Defense 6 NA | 5,338 Decrease FCS Rank 85 |
| 2012 | 3-8 | Tony Samual | @ SEMO 28-51 Winning Percentage 35.44 | 435-489-37 Winning Percentage 47.19 | Total Win Rank 66 Winning Percentage Rank 93 | Total 46 Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense 8 Defense 5 | 5,477 Increase FCS Rank 82 |
| 2013 | 3-9 | Tony Samual | @ SEMO 31-60 Winning Percentage 34.07 | 438-498-37 Winning Percentage 46.92 | Total Win Rank 69 Winning Percentage Rank 97 | Total NA Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 4,165 Decrease FCS Rank 98 |
| 2014 | 5-7 | Tom Matukewicz | @ SEMO 5-7 Winning Percentage 41.67 | 443-505-37 Winning Percentage 46.85 | Total Win Rank 68 Winning Percentage Rank 90 | Total NA Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 5,189 Increase FCS Rank 83 |
| 2015 | 4-7 | Tom Matukewicz | @ SEMO 9-14 Winning Percentage 39.13 | 447-512-37 Winning Percentage 46.74 | Total Win Rank 69 Winning Percentage Rank 93 | Total NA Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 4,804 Decrease FCS Rank 99 |
| 2016 | 3-8 | Tom Matukewicz | @ SEMO 12-22 Winning Percentage 35.29 | 450-520-37 Winning Percentage 46.52 | Total Win Rank 69 Winning Percentage Rank 93 | Total NA Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 5,363 Increase FCS Rank 86 |
| 2017 | 3-8 | Tom Matukewicz | @ SEMO 15-30 Winning Percentage 33.33 | 453-528-37 Winning Percentage 46.32 | Total Win Rank 69 Winning Percentage Rank 93 | Total NA Off. NA Def. NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 3,864 Decrease FCS Rank 97 |
| 2018 | 9-4 | Tom Matukewicz | @ SEMO 24-34 Winning Percentage 41.37 | 462-532-37 Winning Percentage 46.61 | Total Win Rank 70 Winning Percentage Rank 93 | Total Offense Defense NA ST | Offense NA Defense NA | 4,498 Increase FCS Rank 89 |
| 2019 | 9-4 | Tom Matukewicz | @ SEMO 33-38 Winning Percentage 46.48 | 471-536-37 Winning Percentage 48.89 | Total Win Rank 68 Winning Percentage Rank 93 | Total NA Offense NA Defense NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 4,323 Decrease FCS Rank 88 |
| 2020 | 4-4 | Tom Matukewicz | @ SEMO 37-42 Winning Percentage 46.83 | 475-540-37 Winning Percentage 46.91 | Total Win Rank 68 Winning Percentage Rank 94 | Total NA Offense NA Defense NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | Covid 19 |
| 2021 | 4-7 | Tom Matukewicz | @ SEMO 41-49 Winning Percentage 45.56 | 479-547-37 Winning Percentage 46.80 | Total Win Rank 69 Winning Percentage Rank 96 | Total NA Offense NA Defense NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 3,729 Decrease FCS Rank 98 |
| 2022 | 8-3 | Tom Matukewicz | @ SEMO 49-52 Winning Percentage 48.51 | 487-550-37 Winning Percentage 47.07 | Total Win Rank 70 Winning Percentage Rank 94 | Total NA Offense NA Defense NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 2,226 Decrease FCS Rank 116 |
| 2023 | 4-7 | Tom Matukewicz | @ SEMO 53-59 Winning Percentage 47.32 | 491-557-37 Winning Percentage 46.96 | Total Win Rank 67 Winning Percentage Rank 89 | Total NA Offense NA Defense NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 5,732 Increase FCS Rank 65 |
| 2024 | 9-4 | Tom Matukewicz | @ SEMO 62-63 Winning Percentage 49.60 | 500-561-37 Winning Percentage 47.22 | Total Win Rank 66 Winning Percentage Rank 89 | Total NA Offense NA Defense NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | 6,022 Increase FCS Rank 59 |
| 2025 | 0-0 | Tom Matukewicz | @ SEMO 62-63 Winning Percentage 49.60 | 500-561-37 Winning Percentage 47.22 | Total Win Rank 66 Winning Percentage Rank 90 | Total NA Offense NA Defense NA S.T. NA | Offense NA Defense NA | TBD |
| 2026 | 0-0 | |||||||
| * = Returning Quarterback | ||||||||
Schedule (2012)
Season Year >
Record 2012
Overall: W:3 L:8 T:0
Conf: W:3 L:8 T:0
Division: W:3 L:8 T:0
| Game Date | Home VS Away | Score | Game Stats | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Aug-30 2012 |
Central Michigan
-VS- SE Missouri State |
LOSS 38 - 27 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sep-08 2012 |
SE Missouri State
-VS- Mars Hill |
WIN 30 - 18 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sep-15 2012 |
Southern Illinois
-VS- SE Missouri State |
LOSS 35 - 14 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sep-22 2012 |
SE Missouri State
-VS- Tennessee Tech |
WIN 41 - 38 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Sep-29 2012 |
Jacksonville State
-VS- SE Missouri State |
LOSS 31 - 16 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BYE WEEK! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Oct-13 2012 |
SE Missouri State
-VS- Tennessee State |
LOSS 28 - 40 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Oct-20 2012 |
SE Missouri State
-VS- Tennessee Martin |
LOSS 17 - 27 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Oct-27 2012 |
Austin Peay
-VS- SE Missouri State |
WIN 27 - 48 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Nov-03 2012 |
SE Missouri State
-VS- Eastern Kentucky |
LOSS 7 - 31 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Nov-10 2012 |
Eastern Illinois
-VS- SE Missouri State |
LOSS 39 - 20 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Nov-17 2012 |
Murray State
-VS- SE Missouri State |
LOSS 42 - 35 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Record 2012Overall: W:3 L:8 T:0 |
Totals
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Offense Data Back To Top
Offense Total Yards
| Games | Yards | Avg. Yards Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 3942 | 358 |
Offense Passing
| Games | Yards | Avg. Passing Yards Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 1061 | 96 |
Offense Rushing
| Games | Yards | Avg. Rushing Yards Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 2881 | 262 |
Offense Scoring
| Games | Total Points | Avg. Points Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 283 | 26 |
Offense Turnovers
| Games | Turnovers | Avg. Turnovers Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 21 | 1.91 |
Offense Third Down Conversion
| Third Down Attempts | Third Down Coversions | Third Down Conversion Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| 155 | 66 | 42.6% |
Offense Red Zone
| Games | RZ Drives | RZ Scores | RZ Points | RZ Rushing TD | RZ Passing TD | RZ TD Total | RZ Field Goals | RZ Scoring Percentage | RZ TD Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 46 | 36 | 183 | 19 | 6 | 25 | 11 | 78% | 54% |
Defense Data Back To Top
Defense Total Yards
| Games | Opponent Total Yards | Opponent Avg. Yards Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 4806 | 437 |
Defense Passing
| Games | Opponent Total Passing Yards | Opponent Avg. Passing Yards Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 2693 | 245 |
Defense Rushing
| Games | Opponent Total Rushing Yards | Opponent Avg. Passing Yards Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 2113 | 192 |
Defense Scoring
| Games | Opponent Total Points | Opponent Avg. Points Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 366 | 33 |
Defense Turnovers
| Games | Opponent Turnovers | Opponent Avg. Turnovers Per Game |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 22 | 2 |
Defense Third Down Stops
| Opponent Third Down Attempts | Opponent Third Down Coversions | Opponent Third Down Conversion Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| 149 | 82 | 55% |
Defense Red Zone
| Games | Opponent RZ Drives | Opponent RZ Scores | Opponent RZ Points | Opponent RZ Rushing_TD | Opponent RZ Passing_TD | Opponent RZ Zone TD | Opponent RZ Field Goals | Opponent RZ Scoring Percentage | Opponent RZ TD Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 50 | 38 | 207 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 7 | 76% | 62% |
Follow us On Twitter
Become a Friend On Facebook